Was the boy another victim on the altar of the vaccine priests?
Translated by specialist doctor Jeanne Rungby
This is a report from Latvia. This is an incident which may very well soon also happen in Denmark and the rest of Europe, due to our probably future participation in EUVABECO,
A 4-year-old boy was admitted to Children's Clinical University Hospital with breathing problems on 5 September this year.
This story is told by the boy's parents and their lawyers in Latvia.
The boy had signs of a respiratory infection. A test had allegedly shown diphtheria. The father stayed with the boy in hospital, but the mother was perceived as contagious and therefore quarantined.
On the day of admission, the boy could walk on his own, talk and behaved like a normal child, but with signs of a cold.
There are 4 children in the family, all unvaccinated.
A so-called "anti-vaxer family".
The mother was not allowed to be near the boy during the treatment. A few days later, the mother brought her 2 daughters to the hospital, fearing that they too had been infected. Preventive antibiotic treatment was started.
And here started the unusual in this story.
In all national media, the story read that 4 children were hospitalized with diphtheria, with the explicit emphasis that these children were unvaccinated. This is where the dehumanization of anti-vaxxers began.
The little boy received special treatment. The very day after admission, he was put into an artificial coma with the aim of diagnosing and starting treatment, which resulted in the diagnosis of myocarditis.
A few days later, he developed renal insufficiency (the kidneys stopped working), so it was decided to start dialysis (artificial purification of the blood).
The parents were told that the boy could die from the treatment. On 15 September, dialysis was interrupted for 8 hours due to a blood clot in the dialysis filter. After this, they chose to operate to insert a pacemaker. The boy died on September 16 on the operating table.
The boy turned 5 years old during the hospitalization.
The cause of death was acute myocarditis as the primary cause and diphtheria as the secondary cause.
It must be clarified that only the first tests showed Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Later tests failed to confirm that this pathogen was present. This also applied to tests taken from internal organs during autopsy. Autopsy is mandatory in cases of infectious diseases in Latvia.
Both girls remained hospitalized for a week without further treatment.
The media headlines read that the little boy had died of diphtheria. A public scare campaign was blown up in these media that diphtheria was in circulation. Parents were scared on social media and many rushed to get themselves and their children vaccinated.
The Minister of Health started a committee and had changes introduced in laws to limit parents' rights in relation to their children if they did not let their children vaccinate and introduced compulsory vaccination.
The Ombudsman's office and well-known lawyers published information that there was a legal order stating that if a parent refused to vaccinate a child, the family doctor could write a report to the custody court (such an institution still exists in Latvia and its powers are dubious), who could then intervene and order the child vaccinated within three days.
Other lawyers assure that there is no such legislation at the national level! Patient rights define a parent's right to make decisions about their child's health care, including the right to refuse treatment. The Oviedo Convention also establishes this right.
It is important to note that Latvia has just joined the EUVABECO (European Vaccination Beyond Covid) pilot project implemented by Riga Stradiņš University.
(My comments: EUVABECO is a collaboration between the EU and WHO. This collaboration is about sharing patient records including information about vaccines for all people in the countries participating in EUVABECO. see link below)
A legal team around the parents decided to counter the government's misleading claims on social media by describing the true story and that there was no legal basis for forced vaccination.
Realizing that something was not right in the children's treatment, and that the family's situation seemed to have been exploited to mislead the public, the parents decided to take their daughters home from the hospital and renounce further treatment. They exercised their statutory rights to refuse further treatment, fearing that the daughters could risk being treated to death.
The following morning, at 06:10, 6 police officers and the Emergency Medical Service arrived at the property where the mother and her two daughters were staying. The mother was detained and taken to a temporary detention facility, while the children were taken back to the hospital by ambulance. The children's father was also detained and removed from his residence. That same evening, after the parents had taken the children out of the hospital, the custody court decided to terminate the custody of both daughters and initiated criminal proceedings under Article 141(1). 2, of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Latvia (For a person who deliberately leaves a person without help, who is in a condition where life or health is in danger, and who cannot save himself due to his youth, old age, illness or weakness, if the perpetrator could have provided help to the victim and had a duty to take care of him or her, or if the perpetrator himself has put the person in a life-threatening condition).
The demonization of this family and the dehumanization of people who do not want to receive a vaccine as well as threats of forced removal of children if they do not vaccinate their children continue to run in the media.
The parents are called "murderous fools".
Their views are belittled. The other side, in turn, demands an investigation and an end to the deception of the public. The legal team around the family has continued a counter-argument campaign.
The team consists of a number of lawyers who will ensure that this situation is thoroughly explained. The team has both parents released, but they have been denied access to their two daughters, who are still hospitalized and receiving treatment - it is unknown for what. All tests for diphtheria were negative in the daughters. At the time of writing, the little boy has not been buried. There is a real risk that the two daughters will also be treated to death.
There is therefore a need for the outside world to be informed about this deception, which can become a reality for all parents in the EU who do not want their children vaccinated.
The parents need the support of the outside world to get their daughters back and to investigate this possible crime against the little boy and the family
Spread the story internationally. What has happened to this family can become a reality for all families throughout the world.
It is assumed that this is a media show and that the purpose is to introduce vaccination passports throughout the world and thus total control over the world's citizens and the violation of the human right to bodily autonomy.
Please support us and we are ready to provide further information to press and medias.
This is disclosed by the family's lawyer:
Agita Galina
Lawyer from Latvia
Addendum: I did not have access to the boy's health record and such a story can have many angles depending on who is telling the story. But the scenario is plausible in these times, when mandating vaccines and violating human rights seem to be the new normal.
It is important to note that this participation in EUVABECO seems to imply that the medical record is no longer secured as a confidential document/working tool, as the doctor-patient confidentiality contract prescribes in medical consultations, as medical record information apparently (with the agreement of the EU with WHO summer 2023) is intercepted from mandated digital medical records without either the patient's or the doctor's approval. A topic that should be debated prior to Denmark's possible participation in this project.
Comments